India Innovation Centre for Graphene
India Innovation Centre for Graphene [IICG] announces “Grand Challenge on Graphene Technologies for ENERGY, ELECTRONICS & TRANSPORTATION”.
Background
India Innovation Centre for Graphene (IICG), is a pioneering initiative of Ministry of Electronics and Information Technology, Government of India and Government of Kerala along with Centre for Materials for Electronics Technology, Thrissur (C-MET) and Kerala University of Digital Sciences, Innovation and Technology (Digital University Kerala), with M/s Tata Steel Ltd. (TSL), Mumbai as the implementing agencies. The objectives of the center focus on R&D, innovation, and capacity-building activities which lead to knowledge transfer in the area of graphene and its applications.
To accelerate economically viable technology development, IICG is introducing its FIRST Grand Challenge for the most profitable business case for Graphene based products in India. The scope of the Grand Challenge is solutions based on graphene
technologies in the area of Energy, Electronics and Transportation and preparation of business case reports.
Aim
To conduct the IICG Grand Challenge which will produce accelerated output for the research topic “Best solution and business case for use graphene technologies in the area of Energy,
Electronics and Transportation. The winning participants will be incubated as startups in IICG.
- Grand Challenge Statement
Graphene technologies in the area of Energy, Electronics and Transportation represent the main theme of the grand challenge.
Further, the solution will help to create economically viable technological products using the Graphene technologies being developed by the IICG, Kochi.
Besides having the capability in developing relevant new technologies, the IICG in the recent past has developed several technologies such as :
Graphene Supercapacitors
Graphene-based Sensors
Graphene-based Composites
Graphene conducting inks
The challenge is divided into two parts:
Development of Graphene devices/hardware solutions using the devices described above or similar development of Graphene based technologies.
The participants need to submit ideas, designs, product plans or prototypes of their proposed solutions.
Participants need to submit and justify the expected Technology Readiness Level (TRL Level) of their end-product. (Refer to Appendix 1 for TRL Level definitions)
2 . Preparation of business cases for their solution.
Participants need to submit and justify the current and expected Commercial Readiness Level (CRL Level) (Refer to Appendix 2 for CRL Level definitions)
The business case may cover aspects such as potential target markets to enter size, competitive landscape, key players in the market, market needs & requirements at a level in line with the current CRL
Business case should provide broad development milestones and proposed budget
1. Prize Money and funding
Funding of up to Rs 20 lakhs per project
2. Eligibility Criteria
The challenge is open to all Indian startups
3. Implementing Agency
The implementing agency will be the IICG, Kochi.
4. Evaluation Methodology
Internal Review: An Expert Panel (EP) will evaluate the proposals and will finalize 5 top teams.
Interview: The EP will conduct interviews for top 5 teams and finalize the winner for the Grand Challenge Award.
5. Duration of Grand Challenge and Registration
Submission last date: February 25, 2024
Internal Review result: March 15, 2024
Declaration of winner: March 20, 2024
Registration Link: https://docs.google.com/forms/d/1mN3asNYkjVglAJd-nHQh78VTeUz0bmkKqX1fuWvIMLk/viewform?pli=1&pli=1&edit_requested=true
6. Rule and Guidelines
All participants and team have to be eligible (See Eligibility Criteria) to participate.
During the Challenge, the Team Leader shall be considered as the Single Point of Contact for all engagements & communication by the IICG. Furthermore, the Team Leader cannot be changed during the course of the Challenge.
The Team Leader and Team Members will be required to provide working E-mail IDs and Mobile numbers for the purpose of Registration/ Communication.
Teams shall maintain detailed documentation of their Idea, Prototype and Solution at all stages of the Challenge for reference and record purposes.
The right to summarily reject any change in team composition is vested with IICG.
Any IPR generated in the Grand Challenge shall be jointly owned by the IICG and the contributing team through a separate MoU as per Indian Laws/ Rules.
The solution should not violate/breach/copy any idea/concept/product already copyrighted, patented or existing in this segment of the market. Legal liability of such infringement will be the sole responsibility of the applicant team.
Anyone found to be non-compliant of rules and guidelines face the risk of their participation getting canceled.
All documents/ papers etc submitted in relation to the Grand Challenge are non-returnable and shall remain as the property of IICG.
The number of teams to be finally selected and incubated or not to be selected at all is at the sole discretion of IICG and no suggestions and disputes will be entertained.
For any dispute redress, Secretary (MeitY)’s decision will be the final.
Appendix 1
Technology Readiness Levels (TRL)
Technology Readiness Levels (TRL) are a method used to measure and assess the maturity of a particular technology
TRL is based on a scale from 1 to 9 with 9 being the most mature technology.
Level | Definition | TRL Description |
1 | Basic principles observed and reported | Lowest level of technology readiness. Scientific research begins to be translated into applied research and development. Examples might include paper studies of a technology’s basic properties. |
2 | Technology concept and/or application formulated. | Invention begins. Once basic principles are observed, practical applications can be invented. Applications are speculative and there may be no proof or detailed analysis to support the assumptions. Examples are limited to analytic studies. |
3 | Analytical and experimental critical function and/or characteristic proof of concept. | Active research and development is initiated. This includes analytical studies and laboratory studies to physically validate analytical predictions of separate elements of the technology. Examples include components that are not yet integrated or representative. |
4 | Component and/or breadboard validation in laboratory environment. | Basic technological components are integrated to establish that they will work together. This is relatively “low fidelity” compared to the eventual system. Examples include the integration of “ad hoc” hardware in the laboratory. |
5 | Component and/or breadboard validation in relevant environments. | The Fidelity of breadboard technology increases significantly. The basic technological components are integrated with reasonably realistic supporting elements so it can be tested in a simulated environment. |
6 | System/subsystem model or prototype demonstration in a relevant environment. | A representative model or prototype system, which is well beyond that of TRL 5, is tested in a relevant environment. Represents a major step up in a technology’s demonstrated readiness. |
7 | System prototype demonstration in an operational environment. | Prototype near, or at, planned operational system. Represents a major step up from TRL 6, requiring the demonstration of an actual system prototype in an operational environment such as an aircraft, vehicle, or space. |
8 | Actual system completed and qualified through test and demonstration. | Technology has been proven to work in its final form and under expected conditions. In almost all cases, this TRL represents the end of true system development. Examples include developmental test and evaluations of the system in its intended weapon system to determine if it meets design specifications. |
9 | Actual system has proven through successful mission operations. | The actual application of the technology in its final form and under mission conditions, such as those encountered in operational test and evaluation. Examples include using the system under operational mission conditions. |
Appendix 2
Commercial Readiness Levels (TRL)
Commercial Readiness Levels (CRL) is a framework for defining the spectrum of commercial maturity, from basic market research to full deployment.
CRL is based on a scale from 1 to 9 with 9 being the most commercial technology.
CRL | Description |
1 | Knowledge of applications, use-cases, & market constraints is limited and incidental, or has yet to be obtained at all. |
2 | A cursory familiarity with potential applications, markets, and existing competitive technologies/products exists. Market research is derived primarily from secondary sources. Product ideas based on the new technology may exist, but are speculative and unvalidated. |
3 | A more developed understanding of potential applications, technology use-cases, market requirements/constraints, and a familiarity with competitive technologies and products allows for initial consideration of the technology as product. One or more “strawman” product hypotheses are created, and may be iteratively refined based on data from further technology and market analysis. Commercialization analysis incorporates a stronger dependence on primary research and considers not only current market realities but also expected future requirements. |
4 | A primary product hypothesis is identified and refined through additional technology-product-market analysis and discussions with potential customers and/or users. Mapping technology/product attributes against market needs highlights a clear value proposition. A basic cost-performance model is created to support the value proposition and provide initial insight into design trade-offs. Basic competitive analysis is carried out to illustrate unique features and advantages of technology. Potential suppliers, partners, and customers are identified and mapped in an initial value-chain analysis. Any certification or regulatory requirements for product or process are identified. |
5 | A deep understanding of the target application and market is achieved, and the product is defined. A comprehensive cost-performance model is created to further validate the value proposition and provide a detailed understanding of product design trade-offs. Relationships are established with potential suppliers, partners, and customers, all of whom are now engaged in providing input on market requirements and product definition. A comprehensive competitive analysis is carried out. A basic financial model is built with initial projections for near- and long-term sales, costs, revenue, margins, etc. |
6 | Market/customer needs and how those translate to product needs are defined and documented (e.g. in market and product requirements documents). Product design optimization is carried out considering detailed market and product requirements, cost/performance trade-offs, manufacturing trade-offs, etc. Partnerships are formed with key stakeholders across the value chain (e.g. suppliers, partners, customers). All certification and regulatory requirements for the product are well understood and appropriate steps for compliance are underway. Financial models continue to be refined. |
7 | Product design is complete. Supply and customer agreements are in place, and all stakeholders are engaged in product/process qualifications. All necessary certifications and/or regulatory compliance for product and production operations are accommodated. Comprehensive financial models and projections have been built and validated for early stage and late stage production. |
8 | Customer qualifications are complete, and initial products are manufactured and sold. Commercialization readiness continues to mature to support larger scale production and sales. Assumptions are continually and iteratively validated to accommodate market dynamics. |
9 | Widespread deployment is achieved. |
Comments